Showing posts with label products. Show all posts
Showing posts with label products. Show all posts

Thursday, July 15, 2010

What will Apple say about the iPhone 4?

 What will Apple say about the iPhone 4?

A case giveaway? A recall? Duct tape? Analysts says any of those options, and nothing, is possible

By Matt Hamblen
July 15, 2010 10:56 AM ET
 
Computerworld - By now, the civilized world knows Apple has called a press conference for tomorrow, presumably to address the antenna and reception problems experienced by some iPhone 4 users.
There is speculation that Apple could announce some kind of program to give away a $29 Apple-branded Bumper case that would fix the wireless signal reduction. The disruption occurs when a user holds the lower left side of the phone and covers the gap in the antenna that encircles the exterior edge of the phone.
Consumer Reports recommended that Apple give the plastic and rubber Bumper or some other phone case to iPhone 4 owners, since its own testing showed that a Bumper would help prevent the reduction in the wireless signal.
 Consumer Reports had issued an earlier finding that it could not recommend the iPhone 4 because of the reception issue. Even duct tape over the lower left side gap help, or holding the phone differently, the magazine said, but noted that those solutions put the burden for a fix on the user.
Apple did not respond to requests for comment.
As a respected, independent testing authority, Consumer Reports' recommendation to give away a Bumper has considerable weight, as several financials firms have noted, including Bernstein Research analyst Toni Sacconaghi. A Bumper costs Apple $1 or less and would be "financially immaterial," Sacconaghi said, and much less than a full recall.

While the Bumper giveaway may sound logical, several analysts today said Apple still could appear at the Friday event and obfuscate the issue and then give away nothing. Some even said Apple could use a software update, iOS 4.0.1, which is reported by Macrumors to ship today with a new signal strength indicator for the phone as the basis of the event, to show it had addressed the reception issue with a promised software update. Apple first described the need for the update in July 2 letter on its Web site. 

Successful as it is, Apple can be stubborn for many reasons, analysts said, and might avoid a hardware fix, recall or Bumper giveaway because it wouldn't want to admit it made a mistake in design or testing of the iPhone 4 before it went on sale.
"They need to acknowledge there is a problem, which they probably won't do very effectively," said Jack Gold, an analyst at J. Gold Associates. "They should say they've heard their customers and take the complaints very seriously, even if just a small minority of customers are experiencing problems. I suspect they will downplay this and say how many happy and loyal customer they have."
Gold and others said the signal indicator fix (which basically makes the bars bigger on the interface) is a red herring for the overall reception issue. "It's a lame excuse saying they were stunned that their software calculations on signal strength were wrong," he said. "The question is, will they step forward and take some responsibility and the do the right thing for customers and their credibility or just continue to obfuscate and make excuses?"
Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney basically agreed. "There are two things going on -- a software [signal strength] bug and an antenna design problem," Dulaney said. "Apple has left it very easy for users to conclude the antenna issue could be overcome by software."
But Dulaney said a software fix is not enough, a position bolstered by the Consumer Reports testing and his own insights. Telling customers to hold the phone differently to improve signal strength, as it has suggested before, "would not be acceptable to most, [meaning] Apple criticism on the issue would continue."
Dulaney went so far as to say that Apple might actually come up with some kind of "aesthetically pleasing tape" to fix the problem, but he agreed that a free case would be the best option. Customers should be offered refunds if even a free case doesn't work, he said.

Dulaney said he would be surprised if Apple issued an iPhone 4 recall over the reception issue, because processing of the units would be an "enormous task."
Whether the reception issue is due to the software or more likely the hardware, "Apple should just fess up to the problem and do what they need to do in order to get customers a phone that works properly," said Zeus Kerravala, an analyst at Yankee Group. "Their obligation is to give customers a working phone, not just skirt the issue continually."

Article by Matt Hamblen From Computer World


Saturday, July 3, 2010

Brand Names-A Status Symbol

Simple photograph of an American Eagle polo (T...Image via Wikipedia
Aerpostale. American Eagle. Nike. Hollister.
Sound familiar? Look familiar? The above names are seen plastered onto the shirts of the population.
Brand names. A status symbol. In this world wearing lets say "Nike" means you have the money to afford it. Its a status symbol like having a Ferrari is. To express your wealth even if you don't have any. Its sad if you think about it. This country worries about not having the right "Status." While in other countries they struggle to even live the next day. As long as they get clothes they are happy. But here we have people who have meltdowns if the shirt is not in their size.

Anyway, you see this mostally in the "teen" population. In high schools if you walk into schools do their shirts say:
Hollister
Or Walmart? They feel pride wearing brand names because it means they have the money and wealth to spend it on. If you ask them they will spill out some junk "Oh I wear it because its comfy!" No you don't. They are both made out of the same material. Who knows maybe we will wake up and find out that the clothes from walmart and Amercian eagle are from the same place?

Anyway, Brand names are actually a smart idea. The kids walk around wearing it plastered onto themselves, Advertising for the company. Its the best of both worlds! The kids pay to adversite! Its a dream come true for some CEOS. The person who is the lucky CEO of the popular store Lu-Lu Lemon is laughing all the way to the bank. People daily are spending over $100 for a same-as-walmart-quality pair of pants. Why do people buy it? Because they are "someone" in the opinon of society if they own a pair of these pants.
I actually was talking to a girl, and it was the middle of summer and she was wearing a Lu-Lu-Lemon sweater. "It was only $68! And it was 50% off!"
I almost fainted. I'm not saying I'm cheap or anything (maybe I am) but I just have better things to spend my money on than Clothes which get wrecked and lose their value within an easy year! Clothes all have the same purpose "To wear" if one is more expensive that doesn't change its purpose does it?  They all have the same purpose and why care about which one costs more when it all goes down-They all have the same purpose

Enhanced by Zemanta
Related Posts with Thumbnails